Students' retention on online learning: Establishing a predictive model at a private university in Vietnam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.22249Keywords:
students’ retention, online learning, predictive model, private universityAbstract
Low levels of student retention have become one of the most significant issues that online learning has brought about. Through the literature review, most studies have pointed out some factors contributing to student retention in online learning environments; however, few have focused on establishing a model that minimizes student dropout rates. Hence, this paper aims to formulate a predictive model to tackle this issue. Through the quantitative survey design and the PSL-SEM approach in data analysis, the research involved 100 students. After analyzing the data, it is suggested that some factors and their relationship with student retention. These were Academic locus of control, Flow experience, Satisfaction, and Learning strategies. Also, this study indicated that to improve the students’ retention in online learning, Student satisfaction should be paid more attention rather than the others.
References
Alexander, P. A., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1998). A perspective on strategy research: Progress and prospects. Educational psychology review, 10(2), 129-154.
Burke, A. (2019). Student retention models in higher education: A literature review. College and University, 94(2), 12-21.
Choi, H. (2016). Theoretical framework for adult dropout in a cyber university. Online Learning Consortium (OLC) Accelerate, 7(7), 70-79.
Choi, Y. (2018). Student employment and persistence: Evidence of effect heterogeneity of student employment on college dropout. Research in Higher Education, 59(1), 88-107.
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences: Academic Press. New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9458-y
Chongbang, Nirmal. (2022). Socioeconomic Condition of Parents Impact into Learning Practices during Pandemic, Nepal, BRICS Journal of Educational Research, 12 (1), 33-37
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Merrill.
Crosling, G. (2017). Student retention in higher education, a shared issue. Encyclopedia of international higher education systems and institutions, 1(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_314-1
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikzentmihaly, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Perennial.
Curtain, R. (2002). Online delivery in the vocational education and training sector. Improving Cost Effectiveness. Australian National Training Authority. National Centre for Vocational Education Research, Australia.
Dolce, P., Vinzi, V. E., & Lauro, C. (2017). Predictive path modeling through PLS and other component-based approaches: methodological issues and performance evaluation. In Partial Least Squares Path Modeling (pp. 153-172): Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_7
Elliott, K. M. (2002). Key Determinants of Student Satisfaction. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 4(3), 271-279. https://doi.org/10.2190/b2v7-r91m-6wxr-kccr
Fadde, P. J., & Vu, P. (2014). Blended online learning: Benefits, challenges, and misconceptions. Online learning: Common misconceptions, benefits and challenges, 9(4) , 33-48.
Findley, M., & Cooper, H. (1983). The relation between locus of control and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(2), 419-427.
Fraser, J., Fahlman, D. W., Arscott, J., & Guillot, I. (2018). Pilot testing for feasibility in a study of student retention and attrition in online undergraduate programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 260-278. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3326
Friðriksdóttir, K. (2018). The impact of different modalities on student retention and overall engagement patterns in open online courses. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(1-2), 53-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1381129
Gall, M., Gall, J., Jacobsen, D., & Bullock, T. (1990). Tools for learning. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Gianakos, I. (2002). Predictors of coping with work stress: The influences of sex, gender role, social desirability, and locus of control. Sex Roles, 46(5), 149-158. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019675218338
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long range planning, 46(1-2), 1-12.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hamid, R., Sentryo, I., & Hasan, S. (2020). Online learning and its problems in the Covid-19 emergency period. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 8(1), 86-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v8i1.32165
Hanson, M. (2022, June 17). College Dropout Rates. Education Data Incentive. Retrieved June 17, 2022, from https://educationdata.org/college-dropout-rates
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-11-2014-0081
Hout, M. (2012). Social and economic returns to college education in the United States. Annual review of sociology, 38, 379-400. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102503
Joo, Y. J., Joung, S., & Sim, W. J. (2011). Structural relationships among internal locus of control, institutional support, flow, and learner persistence in cyber universities. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 714-722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.09.007
Kakuchi, S. (2021). Student dropout rate on the rise due to pandemic impact. University World News. Retrieved from https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=2021031006383627
Keller, J., & Blomann, F. (2008). Locus of control and the flow experience: An experimental analysis. European Journal of Personality, 22(7), 589-607. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.692
Kock, N. (2016). Hypothesis testing with confidence intervals and P values in PLS-SEM. International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJeC), 12(3), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJeC.2016070101
Lee, E. (2001). The relations of motivation and cognitive strategies to flow experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 15(3), 199-216.
Lee, K. (2017). Rethinking the accessibility of online higher education: A historical review. The internet and higher education, 33, 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.001
Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2013). A structural equation model of predictors of online learning retention. The internet and higher education, 16, 36-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.01.005
Levy, Y. (2007). Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses. Computers & Education, 48(2), 185-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.12.004
Mansfield, M., O'Leary, E., & Webb, S. (2011). Retention in Higher Education: Faculty and Student Perceptions of Retention Programs and Factors Impacting Attrition Rates. Journals of Indiana University South Bend, 7(1), 4-62.
Mark, E. (2013). Student satisfaction and the customer focus in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(1), 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2012.727703
McKeachie, W. J. (1987). Teaching and Learning in the College Classroom. Michigan: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
Miller, N. (2017). A model for improving student retention in adult accelerated education programs. Education, 138(1), 104-114.
Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The internet and higher education, 14(2), 129-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001
Morris, L. V., Wu, S.-S., & Finnegan, C. L. (2005). Predicting retention in online general education courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), 23-36.
Mubarak, A. A., Cao, H., & Zhang, W. (2020). Prediction of students’ early dropout based on their interaction logs in online learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1727529
Muljana, P. S., & Luo, T. (2019). Factors contributing to student retention in online learning and recommended strategies for improvement: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 18(1), 19-57. https://doi.org/10.28945/4182
Ngo, D. H. (2021). Perceptions of EFL tertiary students towards the correlation between e-learning and learning engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 1(3), 235-259. Retrieved from http://i-jte.org/index.php/journal/article/view/99. EOI: http://eoi.citefactor.org/10.11250/ijte.01.03.013.
Nguyen, H., & Vu, T. (2020). Phân tích dữ liệu áp dụng mô hình PLS-SEM [Data analysis using PLS-SEM model]. Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam: NXB Kinh Tế Thành Phố Hồ Chí Minh.
Nguyen, T. T. H. (2021). Implementing Digital Techniques to Stimulate EFL Students’ Engagement: A Case Study in Vietnam. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 1(3), 105-129. EOI: http://eoi.citefactor.org/10.11250/ijte.01.03.007
Patterson, B., & McFadden, C. (2009). Attrition in online and campus degree programs. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 12(2), 19-32.
Pham, N. T., & Van Nghiem, H. (2022). Online Teaching Satisfaction amid the Covid-19 Pandemic: Evidence from a Vietnamese Higher Education Context. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 2(1), 310-326. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.222119
Pintrich, P. R. (1988). A process‐oriented view of student motivation and cognition. New directions for institutional research, 1988(57), 65-79.
Ro, Y. K., & Guo, Y. M. (1988). The Effects of Flow on Learning Outcomes in an Online Information Management Course. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(1), 87-98.
Roberts, N., & Thatcher, J. (2009). Conceptualizing and testing formative constructs: Tutorial and annotated example. ACM sigmis database: The database for Advances in Information Systems, 40(3), 9-39. https://doi.org/10.1145/1592401.1592405
Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological monographs: General and applied, 80(1), 1-28.
Rovai, A. P. (2003). In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online programs. The internet and higher education, 6(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00158-6
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2017). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. Handbook of market research, 26(1), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15
Sharma, H., & Aggarwal, A. G. (2019). Finding determinants of e-commerce success: a PLS-SEM approach. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 16(4), 453-471. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-08-2018-0074
Shin, N. (2006). Online learner's 'flow experience: an empirical study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5), 705-720. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00641.x
Simpson, O. (2018). Supporting students in online, open and distance learning: Routledge.
Sorensen, C., & Donovan, J. (2017). An examination of factors that impact the retention of online students at a for-profit university. Online Learning, 21(3), 206-221. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i3.935
Straits, B. C. (2005). Approaches to social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tareen, H., & Haand, M. T. (2020). A case study of UiTM post-graduate students’ perceptions on online learning: Benefits & challenges. International Journal of Advanced Research and Publications, 4(6), 86-94.
Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y.-M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational statistics & data analysis, 48(1), 159-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
Tran, Q. H., & Nguyen, T. M. (2022). Determinants in Student Satisfaction with Online Learning: A Survey Study of Second-Year Students at Private Universities in HCMC. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 2(1), 63-80. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte22215
Villano, R., Harrison, S., Lynch, G., & Chen, G. (2018). Linking early alert systems and student retention: a survival analysis approach. Higher Education, 76(5), 903-920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0249-y
VNS. (2017). Tertiary crisis: are more students’ copping out? Vietnam News. Retrieved from https://vietnamnews.vn/society/417333/tertiary-crisis-are-more-students-copping-out.html
Wardani, D. K., Martono, T., Pratomo, L. C., Rusydi, D. S., & Kusuma, D. H. (2018). Online learning in higher education to encourage critical thinking skills in the 21st century. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(2), 146-153. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.517973
Watson, J., & Johnson, L. K. (2011). Online learning: A 21st century approach to education. In Bringing schools into the 21st century (pp. 205-223): Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0268-4_10
Watson, R. (2015). Quantitative research. Nursing Standard, 29(31), 44-48.
Wu, J.-H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T.-L. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers & Education, 55(1), 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.012
Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. (2011). Online and hybrid course enrollment and performance in Washington State community and technical colleges. Washington: Community College Research Center, Columbia University.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational psychologist, 25(1), 3-17.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Tran Quang Hai, Nguyen Thanh Minh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The copyright of all articles published in the International Journal of TESOL & Education (ijte) remains with the Authors, i.e. Authors retain full ownership of their article. Permitted third-party reuse of the open access articles is defined by the applicable Creative Commons (CC) end-user license which is accepted by the Authors upon submission of their paper. All articles in the ijte are published under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, meaning that end users can freely share an article (i.e. copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt it (i.e. remix, transform and build upon the material) on the condition that proper attribution is given (i.e. appropriate credit, a link to the applicable license and an indication if any changes were made; all in such a way that does not suggest that the licensor endorses the user or the use) and the material is only used for non-commercial purposes.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, in a journal or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.