Implementing Digital Techniques to Stimulate EFL Students’ Engagement: A Case Study in Vietnam
Keywords:
Digital techniques, technology, student engagement, motivationAbstract
This is a mixed-method case study on the use of digital tools to encourage student collaboration in an EFL program class at the University of Economics – Technology for Industries (UNETI). The data were gathered via semi-structured interviews with the teacher, observations, and questionnaires. On the basis of textual and statistical data, the results indicated that both teacher and students were using a variety of digital technologies. Participants are reported to have used digital tools to deliver content, organize class activities, upload and download materials, communicate and interact with peers. The study reveals that students felt motivated through the specific use of technology in the classroom, raising participants' confidence in interacting with collective learning networks and accessing online activities through digital technologies. The research further demonstrates that teaching methods which promote cooperation have consequences for institutional practices in professional development as well as learning assistance schemes and teaching practices.
References
Bond, M., Marin, V., Dolch, C., Bedenlier, S., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2018). Digital transformation in German higher education: Student and teacher perceptions and usage of digital media. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0130-1
Bui, T. X. T., Ha, Y. N., Nguyen, T. B. U, Nguyen, V. U. T, Ngo, T. C. T. (2021). A study on collaborative online learning among EFL students in Van Lang University (VLU). AsiaCall Online Journal, 12(3), 9-21. Retrieved from https://asiacall.info/acoj/index.php/journal/article/view/32
Chau, K. G. (2021). The Effect of ICT on Learners’ Speaking Skills Development. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 1(1), 22–29. Retrieved from https://i-jte.org/index.php/journal/article/view/4
Chow, J., Tse, A., & Armatas, C. (2018). Comparing trained and untrained teachers on their use of LMS tools using the Rasch analysis. Computers & Education, 123(2018), 124-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.009
Chuang, H.-H., Weng, C.-Y., & Huang, F.-C. (2015). A structure equation model among factors of teachers' technology integration practice and their TPCK. Computers & Education, 86(2015), 182-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.016
Coates, H. (2005). The value of student engagement for higher education quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education, 11(1), 25-36. doi:10.1080/13538320500074915
Cooner, T. S. (2010). Creating opportunities for students in large cohorts to reflect in and on practice: Lessons learnt from a formative evaluation of students' experiences of a technology‐enhanced blended learning design. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 271-286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00933.x
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
Cubeles, A., & Riu, D. (2016). Teachers' use of technology in the university classroom. The Fourth International Conference on technological ecosystems for enhancing multiculturality, Spain.
Delfino, A. P. (2019). Student engagement and academic performance of students of Partido State University. Journal of Educational Research, 98, 184-191. Retrieved from http://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/viewFile/367/167
Ernst, J. V., & Moye, J. J. (2013). Social adjustment of at-risk technology education students. Journal of Technology Education, 24(2), 2–13. doi:10.21061/jte.v24i2.a.1
Flanagan, S., Bouck, E. C., & Richardson, J. (2013). Middle school special education teachers’ perceptions and use of assistive technology in literacy instruction. Assistive Technology, 25, 24–30. doi:10.1080/10400435.2012.682697
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059.
Green, J. C., Aziz, T., Joseph, J., Ravanam, A., Shahab, S., & Straus, L. (2018). YouTube enhanced case teaching in health management and policy. Health Professions Education, 4(1), 48- 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2017.02.006.
Hammond, J., & Gibbons, P. (2005). What is scaffolding. Teachers’ voices, 8(2005), 8-16.
Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., Finger, G., & Aston, R. (2015). Students' everyday engagement with digital technology in university: Exploring patterns of use and 'usefulness'. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(3), 308-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2015.1034424
Ho, T. T. H. (2019). The effect of digital apps on Vietnamese EFL learners’ receptive vocabulary acquisition: A case study of Quizlet and paper flashcards. Western Sydney University.
Hoang, N. T., & Le, D. H. (2021). Vocational English Teachers’ Challenges on Shifting Towards Virtual Classroom Teaching. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 12(3), 58-73. Retrieved from https://asiacall.info/acoj/index.php/journal/article/view/39
Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2012). The influence upon design of differing conceptions of teaching and learning with technology. In A. D. Olofsson & J. O. Lindberg (Eds.), Informed design of educational technologies in higher education: Enhanced learning and teaching (pp. 1- 20). IGI Global.
Lai, K. W., & Hong, K. S. (2015). Technology use and learning characteristics of students in higher education: Do generational differences exist? British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(4), 725-738. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12161
Liu, M.-H. (2016). Blending a class video blog to optimize student learning outcomes in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 30(2016), 44-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.03.001
Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2016). Facebook and the others. Potentials and obstacles of social media for teaching in higher education. Computers & Education, 95(2016), 216-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.012.
Nguyen, T. T. (2020). Investigating students’ perception of Kahoot in improving their engagement and collaboration. Journal of Inquiry into Languages and Cultures. Vol.4, No.3 (2020) 420 – 432.
Nguyen, N. T. T. (2021). A review of the effects of media on foreign language vocabulary acquisition. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 1(1), 30–37. Retrieved from https://i-jte.org/index.php/journal/article/view/5
Nguyen, V. M. (2021). English language-learning environments in COVID-19 era. AsiaCall Online Journal, 12(3), 39-46. Retrieved from https://asiacall.info/acoj/index.php/journal/article/view/21
Pham, T. T. (2020). Mobile-Assisted Language Learning In A University Context In Vietnam: Students’ Attitudes. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, Vol.36, No.1 (2020) 103-116.
Shelton, C. (2014). Teacher thinking about technology in higher education: Putting pedagogy and identity in context [Doctoral dissertation]. University College London.
Stake, R. E. (2013). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Press.
Sweeney, D. (2017). How university teachers and students use educational technology in university classroom contexts to optimise learning: a study of purposes, principles, processes and perspectives (Publication Number 13912169) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Leicester]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
Taylor, L., & Clark, S. (2010). Educational Design of Short, Audio-Only Podcasts: The Teacher and Student Experience. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), 386. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1082.
Teo, T., Luan, W.S. & Sing, C.C. (2008). A Cross-Cultural Examination of the Intention to Use Technology between Singaporean and Malaysian Pre-Service teachers: An Application of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 265-280. Retrieved July 15, 2021 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/75056/.
Teo, T. (2010). A path analysis of pre-service teachers' attitudes to computer use: Applying and extending the technology acceptance model in an educational context. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(1), 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820802231327
Thomas, K. M., O’Bannon, B. W., & Bolton, N. (2013). Cell phones in the classroom: Teachers’ perspectives of inclusion, benefits, and barriers. Computers in The Schools, 30, 295–308. doi:10.1080/07380569.2013.844637
Trowler, V. (2010). Student Engagement Literature Review. The Higher Education Academy.Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/studentengagementliteraturereview_1.pdf.
Tour, E. (2015). Digital mindsets: Teachers' technology use in personal life and teaching. Language Learning & Technology, 19(3), 124-139. https://doi.org/10125/44437
Usher, A. (2012). What nontraditional approaches can motivate unenthusiastic students? Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
Van, L. K., Dang, T. A., Pham, D. B. T, Vo, T. T. N., Pham, V. P. H. (2021). The effectiveness of using technology in learning English. AsiaCall Online Journal, 12(2), 24-40. Retrieved from https://asiacall.info/acoj/index.php/journal/article/view/26
Wyatt, H. T., Krauskopf, B. P., Gaylord, M. N., Ward, M. A., Huffstutler-Hawkins, M. S., & Goodwin, M. L. (2010). Cooperative M-Learning with nurse practitioner students. Nursing Education Perspective, 31(2), 109-113.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Nguyen Thi Thanh Ha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The copyright of all articles published in the International Journal of TESOL & Education (ijte) remains with the Authors, i.e. Authors retain full ownership of their article. Permitted third-party reuse of the open access articles is defined by the applicable Creative Commons (CC) end-user license which is accepted by the Authors upon submission of their paper. All articles in the ijte are published under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, meaning that end users can freely share an article (i.e. copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt it (i.e. remix, transform and build upon the material) on the condition that proper attribution is given (i.e. appropriate credit, a link to the applicable license and an indication if any changes were made; all in such a way that does not suggest that the licensor endorses the user or the use) and the material is only used for non-commercial purposes.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, in a journal or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
