Pre-Service Teacher Performance and High-School Student Uptake of Oral Corrective Feedback in EFL Classes in Da Nang

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.22227

Keywords:

oral corrective feedback, types, timing, target errors, student uptake, EFL pre-service teachers, high-school students.

Abstract

The study investigates how pre-service EFL teachers at the University of Foreign Language Studies – the University of Danang (UFLS – UD) perceive and perform oral corrective feedback (OCF); as well as how high-school students respond to OCF. The questionnaire was given to a random group of 32 pre-service teachers, ten classroom observations were made, and five trainees were interviewed. The results demonstrate the types, timing, and target errors of OCF given to learners by novice teachers. Furthermore, despite some matches and mismatches between perception and in-class practices of OCF types, the majority of trainee teachers were aware of the significance and efficiency of correcting verbal errors. As a result, while there were some cases of needs-repair or no uptake produced by learners, successful repairs recorded predominated. The study concludes with practical recommendations to promote future EFL teachers' feedback-giving practices at UFLS-UD in enhancing their professional growth and students' speaking performances at high schools in Danang.

Author Biographies

  • Uyen Thi Phuong Nguyen, University of Foreign Language Studies – The University of Danang, Vietnam

    Nguyen Thi Phuong Uyen is a graduate of Faculty of Foreign Language Teacher Education, University of Foreign Language Studies, University of Danang, Vietnam. She has taught in the private education sector for 3 years and led a community project funded by the U.S Consulate General towards high-school students. Her research interests include speaking skills, and corrective feedback.

  • Uyen Pham Thanh Nguyen, University of Foreign Language Studies – The University of Danang, Vietnam

    Nguyen Pham Thanh Uyen, M.A. is Vice Dean and Senior Lecturer of Faculty of Foreign Language Teacher Education, University of Foreign Language Studies, University of Danang. She earned her M.A. degrees in English studies and English language teaching methodology at the University of Danang, Vietnam and Queensland University, Australia. Her research focuses on English language teaching methodology, teacher professional development, language testing and assessment.

References

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2013). Research methods in education. Routledge.

Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective Feedback and Teacher Development. L2 Journal, 1(1). https://doi:10.5070/l2.v1i1.9054

Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2010). Factors influencing oral corrective feedback provision in the Spanish foreign language classroom: Investigating instructor native/nonnative speaker status, SLA education, & teaching experience. Georgetown University.

Ha, X. V., & Murray, J. C. (2020). Corrective feedback: Beliefs and practices of Vietnamese primary EFL teachers. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820931897

Hanh, P., & Tho, P. (2018). Oral corrective feedback in EFL/ESL classrooms: classification models. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 34(5), 40-48. https://doi:10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4301

Hernández Méndez, E., & Reyes Cruz, M. D. R. (2012). Teachers' perceptions about oral corrective feedback and their practice in EFL classrooms. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 14(2), 63-75.

Huong, L. (2020). Matches And Mismatches Between Efl Teachers’ And Students’ Preferences For Corrective Feedback In English Speaking Classes At A Vietnamese University. VNU Journal Of Foreign Studies, 36(1). doi:10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4505

Islam, W., Ahmad, S., & Islam, M. D. (2022). Investigating the Problems Faced by the University EFL Learners in Speaking English Language. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 2(2), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.22223

Linh, Đ. M. (2018). The Effectiveness of Indirect Written Corrective Feedback as Perceived By Teachers and Students of a Public University in Vietnam. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(4), 152-162.

Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37-66.

Ölmezer-Öztürk, E., & Öztürk, G. (2016). Types and Timing of Oral Corrective Feedback in EFL Classrooms: Voices from Students. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 10(2), 113-133.

Paul Margolis, D. (2011). Handling Oral Error Feedback in Language Classrooms. Minne: Witesol.

Phuong, T. T. B., & Huan, N. B. (2018). Teacher corrective feedback on students’ speaking performance and their uptake in EFL classes. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 3(3), 110–131. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1321246

Quinn, P. (2014). Delayed versus immediate corrective feedback on orally produced passive errors in English (Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto). http://hdl.handle.net/1807/65728

Roothooft, H. (2014). Oral Corrective Feedback: Its effects on the acquisition of English, teaching practices and teachers’ and students’ beliefs. https://hdl.handle.net/10171/40462

Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language teaching research, 8(3), 263-300.

Teh, W. (2021). Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in The Context of Online Learning: A Literature Review. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 1(2), 65–71. Retrieved from https://i-jte.org/index.php/journal/article/view/23

Downloads

Published

12-05-2022

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Nguyen, T. P. U., & Nguyen, P. T. U. (2022). Pre-Service Teacher Performance and High-School Student Uptake of Oral Corrective Feedback in EFL Classes in Da Nang. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 2(2), 119-141. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.22227

Similar Articles

131-140 of 151

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.