An Investigation of Vietnamese Classifiers in English – Vietnamese Translation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.222314

Keywords:

numeral classifiers, stative verbs, animate, inanimate

Abstract

The research was conducted to investigate the use of the three most common classifiers cái, con, người, and figure out the patterns of how to use them when English noun phrases are translated into Vietnamese. To do this, a corpus has been built from the two bestselling literary works The Great Gatsby and Tuesday with Morrie in the English version accompanied by the Vietnamese translated version. The data collected were analyzed in terms of counting numbers of occurrences, calculating percentages and frequency to conclude what classifier among the three is the most frequently used. The findings of this research can be summarized as follow: first, cái is a classifier for inanimate objects, whereas con and người are used with animate ones; however, there is one exception that emerges during the research, which is the classifier con followed by inanimate nouns. Second, from a typical structure of CL + N, formulae are given for the translation of each classifier in specific cases. Finally, double and triple classifiers are chronologically formed by these three classifiers with suggested formulae for Vietnamese translation. The findings aim to support Vietnamese learners using classifiers correctly when translating English noun phrases into Vietnamese noun phrases.

Author Biography

Dang Thi Kim Phuong, Hoa Sen University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Dang Thi Kim Phuong is currently a Master’s degree student at Hoa Sen University in the major of English Language. She is working at the International Schools of North America as a learning support teacher and she has been teaching in the private education sector for about 7 years. At the workplace, she has been facing situations in which Vietnamese students studying in an international environment have struggled to speak and write their mother tongue. This overshadows the beauty of Vietnamese. Understanding this, her research mainly focuses on contrastive English and Vietnamese to find out the easiest way for people to learn Vietnamese effectively.

References

Adams, K. L. (1989). Systems of Numeral Classification in the Mon-Khmer, Nicobarese and Aslian Subfamilies of Austroasiatic. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.

Aikhenvald, A.Y. (2000). Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Allan, Keith (1977). Classifiers. Language, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 285-311.

Cao, X. H. (2004). Tiếng Việt – Sơ thảo ngữ pháp chức năng (The Vietnamese Language – A Rough Draft on Functional Grammar), Hanoi: Publishing House of Social Sciences.

Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1998). The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course, Second Edition (2nd ed.). Heinle ELT.

Croft, W. (1994). “Semantic universals in classifier systems”. Word 45: 145-71

Dam, Q., Pham, G., Potapova, I., & Pruitt-Lord, S. (2020). Grammatical Characteristics of Vietnamese and English in Developing Bilingual Children. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 29(3), 1212–1225. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_ajslp-19-00146

Emeneau, M. B. (1951). Studies in Vietnamese (Annamese) Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Goddard, C. (2011). Semantic Analysis: A Practical Introduction (second edition) New York: Oxford University Press.

Greenberg, Joseph H. (1972). Numeral classifiers and substantival number: Problem in the genesis of a linguistic type. Working Papers in Language. Universals 9.

Grinevald, C. (2015). Classifiers, Linguistics of. In Wright, James D (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Reference Work, 2nd edition, pp. 811-818.

Grinevald, C. (2000). A morphosyntactic typology of classifiers. In Systems of Nominal Classification (Language Culture and Cognition, Series Number 4) (1st ed., pp. 50–92). Cambridge University Press.

Howard, J. (1980). Analyzing English. England: Pergamond Institute of English.

Kuipers, A. H. (1967). The Squamish language. Grammar, text, dictionary. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.

Lau, M. T. (2015). An Investigation of Vietnamese Classifier Constructions. Asian Journal of Educational Research, 3(2), 24-34.

Nguyen, H. T. (2004). The Structure of the Vietnamese Noun Phrase. Ph.D. Dissertation. Boston University

Nguyen, T. C. (1996). Ngữ pháp tiếng Việt (Vietnamese Grammar). Hanoi: Vietnam National University Publishing House.

Nguyen, X. M. (2021). Strategies for Translating English Passive Sentences into Vietnamese. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 2(1), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte22216

Tran, H. T. T. (2021). A Corpus-based Study of Inanimate Classifiers in Vietnamese. University of Manitoba. http://hdl.handle.net/1993/35426

Tran, L. H. N. V. T. (2021). An Analysis of Negative Verbs’ Equivalents in a Vietnamese Translation of ‘The Call of the Wild.’ International Journal of TESOL & Education, 2(1), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.22217

Tran, T. T. H. (2021). A Corpus-based Study of Inanimate Classifiers in Vietnamese (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Manitoba. https://mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca/bitstream/handle/1993/35426/tran_hai.pdf?sequence=1

Verspoor, M., & Sauter, K. (2000). English Sentence Analysis: An introductory course. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Downloads

Published

17-06-2022

How to Cite

Dang, T. K. P. (2022). An Investigation of Vietnamese Classifiers in English – Vietnamese Translation. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 2(3), 208–224. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.222314